Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #1894Re: Modula 2 and Windows
From: Gerd Groos
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1989 08:46
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1989 08:46
17 lines
1198 bytes
1198 bytes
>The move to Modula 2 for the Pascal programmer is a logical stride forward.
>However, what would it take for the C programmers out there to change to
>another language for Windows programming?
How about changing from C to C++ for windows programming? C++ offers all
of C (runtime efficiency and code size) plus strong type checking,
data encapsulation, data abstraction, runtime binding, function overloading.
Modula *3*, people say, offers similar object oriented features.
I think there is no doubt that object oriented programming languages are
ideal for progamming in window based environments. CommonView is a good
example of an object oriented programming interface to windows.
Why settle for less?
Gerd.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10960010@otter.hpl.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!otter!grgReferences:
<2752@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!otter!grg From: grg@otter.hpl.hp.com (Gerd Groos) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Modula 2 and Windows Message-ID: <10960010@otter.hpl.hp.com> Date: 13 Oct 89 08:46:42 GMT References: <2752@PEDEV.Columbia.NCR.COM> Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Bristol, UK. Lines: 17