Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #2047win 2.11 vs 2.17
From: Phil Barrett
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1989 19:19
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1989 19:19
14 lines
985 bytes
985 bytes
There have been several comments lately about windows version 2.17. What has happened is that different programs are interpreting the version number differently. There is no 2.17 -- this the 11 in 2.11 being viewed in hex (11h is 17 decimal). Sigh, a minor ambiguity in the sdk docs. Current release of windows 286 and windows 386 is at 2.11 (or 2.17 for you decimal folks). You should rely on the File/aBout box in the MS-DOS Exec for the `correct' version number rather than any other means. Phil Barrett The above opinions are mine and are not necessarily representative of those of my employer.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9160@microsoft.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!microsoft!philbaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!microsoft!philba From: philba@microsoft.UUCP (Phil Barrett) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: win 2.11 vs 2.17 Message-ID: <9160@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 26 Nov 89 19:19:37 GMT Reply-To: philba@microsoft.UUCP (Phil Barrett) Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA Lines: 14