Re: MS-WINDOWS IN 1024x768 RESOLUTION

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #2181

#2181

From: Tom Haapanen
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 1990 13:27

12 lines
1081 bytes

Phil Ngai <phil@pepsi.AMD.COM> writes:
> Using an Orchid Prodesigner in 1024x768 mode with Micrografx
> Designer, I found the performance also unacceptable. Let's
> all hope that Windows 3.0 is much better.

...but at least on a Paradise VGA Plus, 800x600 mode is not noticeably
slower than VGA.  And the resolution's not bad; maybe you could compromise
until Microsoft makes the announcement we're all holding our breath for...

[ \tom haapanen -- university of waterloo -- tom@mims-iris.waterloo.edu    ]
[ "i say what i say, but i say it for myself and myself only" -- me        ]
[ "i don't even know what street canada is on"                -- al capone ]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1531@watserv1.waterloo.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!tom

References: <327@spot.wbst128.xerox.com> <29563@amdcad.AMD.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!tom
From: tom@mims-iris.waterloo.edu (Tom Haapanen)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: MS-WINDOWS IN 1024x768 RESOLUTION
Message-ID: <1531@watserv1.waterloo.edu>
Date: 20 Mar 90 13:27:13 GMT
References: <327@spot.wbst128.xerox.com> <29563@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Sender: daemon@watserv1.waterloo.edu
Organization: University of Waterloo, WATMIMS Research Group
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message