🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #2216

Re: MS-WINDOWS IN 1024x768 RESOLUTION

#2216
From: Richard Oppenheimer
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 1990 00:59
36 lines
2486 bytes
In article <1003@rna.UUCP> dan@rna.UUCP (Dan Ts'o) writes:
>In article <7269@hydra.gatech.EDU> mmitchel@msd.gatech.edu (Mark A. Mitchell) writes:
>>
>>I'm using a Video Seven VGA 1024i with Windows in 1024x768 resolution and
>>I don't experience these problems.  The redraw of moved windows, in fact,
>>is nearly imperceptable.  (My machine is comparable: Dell System 310, only
>>2 MB RAM.)  I am using Windows/286 rather than /386 because of some 
>>incompatibilities, but it would seem to me that this would make it slower if
>>it has any effect at all.  I have Windows/386 as well, so I'll try the same
>>operations with it when I get a chance.
>
>	I have, on another machine, a Video 7 VRAM card. That card is FAST.
>Works great with Windows 386, EXCEPT that the drivers have a bug such that
>when using the VRAM with DOS 4.01, a DOS-apps always defaults to the A: drive.
>This drives (:-)) me crazy. Video 7 claims this bug will be fixed in a new
>release SOON.
>	Does your VGA 1024i board have this problem ?

I have a Northgate 386 4MB, Video 7 VRAM, and NEC 3D. I run Windows/386 and 
have found no bugs or imcompatibilities with the drivers. I run DOS 4.01 and
use many DOS-apps, none of which default to the a: drive inadvertently.

Signature under construction

       ______
      /     |                   Richard Oppenheimer
      |     \/                  Computer Science Center
      |     Ri                  University of Maryland
    __|__          __           College Park, Maryland ,USA
    |   |  |______|| \          oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (office)
    |   |   OO  OO--0-|         richard@wam.umd.edu (home)
******************************************************************
My employer cares not what I think and knows not what I say. The
opinons expressed herein are my own and are not endorsed by the
Computer Science Center.
******************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6319@umd5.umd.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven!umd5!oppenhei
References: <327@spot.wbst128.xerox.com> <7269@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1003@rna.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven!umd5!oppenhei
From: oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (Richard Oppenheimer)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: MS-WINDOWS IN 1024x768 RESOLUTION
Message-ID: <6319@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: 23 Mar 90 00:59:49 GMT
References: <327@spot.wbst128.xerox.com> <7269@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1003@rna.UUCP>
Reply-To: oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (Richard Oppenheimer)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 36