Re: Why not Qbasic for Windows developm

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #228

#228

From: mms00786
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1989 23:16

9 lines
792 bytes

The June 12th issue of PCWeek has an article about a 1990 version (?) of the
Quick series of compilers for both Windows and PM. I think that they said 
something about QuickC, can't recall anything about QuickBasic. Sure sounds like
a great idea, though.

Milan
mms00786@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <246400013@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!mms00786

References: <205221@<89167>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!mms00786
From: mms00786@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Why not Qbasic for Windows developm
Message-ID: <246400013@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 20 Jun 89 23:16:26 GMT
References: <205221@<89167>
Lines: 9
Nf-ID: #R:<89167:205221:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:246400013:000:291
Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!mms00786    Jun 19 12:49:00 1989

Reply to Parent Message