Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #2427Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
From: Bruce Benson
Date: Sun, 27 May 1990 15:38
Date: Sun, 27 May 1990 15:38
18 lines
1168 bytes
1168 bytes
In article <30244@cup.portal.com> spage@cup.portal.com (S spage Page) writes: > >WfW is very close to Macintosh Word (except for its macro language). Both >WfW and Ami Pro can save in RTF (Rich Text Format). I use Mac Word at work, WfW at home, and just disposed of my Word for DOS. Mac Word, while graphically oriented, has the power of Word for DOS and IMHO is well behind WfW. I suspect an upgrade for Mac Word to incorporate the newer features of WfW will be coming soon. For simple quick notes, I use to use MS Write (over Word for DOS), but now use WfW for all my short one pagers. Bruce --------------- Signature Block ---------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!bwbReferences:
<45720@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <30244@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!sei!bwb From: bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use? Message-ID: <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 27 May 90 15:38:38 GMT References: <45720@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <30244@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: bwb@sei.cmu.edu (Bruce Benson) Organization: Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 18