Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #2486

#2486

From: WALLWEY DEAN WILLIAM
Date: Wed, 30 May 1990 18:22

10 lines
1014 bytes

I have just a few more comments about Word For Windows---

Remember we all are comparing WFW version 1.0 to Words 5.0 and Word
Perfects 5.X.....There are bound to be some bugs and inconsistencies.  I
still would take WFW's first try over the others 5th try any day!

I personaly think WFW is destined for great success....Has anybody
tryed it running under MS Windows 3.0?  Is there much difference?

	-Dean Wallwey

Technical Details

Message-ID: <21701@boulder.Colorado.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!snoopy!wallwey

References: <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> <e4FZJ2w161w@wf-aus.cactus.org> <7367@fy.sei.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!snoopy!wallwey
From: wallwey@snoopy.Colorado.EDU (WALLWEY DEAN WILLIAM)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which Word Processor is easiest to use?
Keywords: Word for Windows, MS Windows 3.0
Message-ID: <21701@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 30 May 90 18:22:24 GMT
References: <7343@fy.sei.cmu.edu> <e4FZJ2w161w@wf-aus.cactus.org> <7367@fy.sei.cmu.edu>
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: wallwey@snoopy.Colorado.EDU (WALLWEY DEAN WILLIAM)
Organization: University of Colorado, boulder
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message