🚀 go-pugleaf

- >Does AD 2.0 have better performance but more importantly can it do more
- >than 16 colours? If not, I shan't be bothering to upgrade my Win 1.0
- >version (I have AD 2.0 on the Mac to appreciate really cute screensavers).

I didn't use version 1.0, so I can't comment on the relative
performance.  However, even when set for maximum cmplexity I find the
performance very good (however, I am running AD on a fast 486).  At
least some of the modules (Aquatic realm, and a few others) can do 256
color support (and, I believe, hi-color support if you have the right
Win drivers).

I've had a number of unexplained crashes that *might* be due to AD 2.0,
although I haven't identified the problem yet.


 * Origin: SeaHunt BBS, PCBoard / HST-DS 1-415-431-0227  (8:914/501)