🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #301

Re: Win 3.1

#301
From: Kuby - Downs
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 00:53
24 lines
1298 bytes
Microsoft's advertising deceitful? Well I hope not! I've invested a fortune
in software already!  I've read on this net that WFW 2.0 is NOT compatable
with the 3.1 Windows upgrade. If this is true, why haven't we heard this
0efore now?  Do you mean to tell me that Microsoft didn't even test it's
own products on 3.1? I find that very hard to believe.

>This is from the March 23rd issue of PC WEEK.
>It includes a list of software that "... may
>experience application errors, problems resizing
>windows and printing files.  User will either
>have to go to the application vendors to obtain
>upgrades or have to change system configuration
>options ...."

Also included on this list was PC Tools v7.1!  Can someone
tell me why in the ham sandwich I should spend $50.00 to
upgrade to 3.1 just so I can have MORE problems.. NO THANKS!


               Darla

         darla@cup.portal.com

 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <56932@cup.portal.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!mips!infoserv!motcsd!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!Darla
References: <1992Mar26.163236.5697@unlinfo.unl.edu> <952@ais.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!mips!infoserv!motcsd!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!Darla
From: Darla@cup.portal.com (Kuby - Downs)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Win 3.1
Message-ID: <56932@cup.portal.com>
Date: 6 Apr 92 00:53:16 GMT
References: <1992Mar26.163236.5697@unlinfo.unl.edu> <952@ais.com>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 24