Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #6774Which graphics-adapter is best?`
From: Thomas Muhr
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 1990 07:40
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 1990 07:40
13 lines
970 bytes
970 bytes
Which graphics adapter offering a minimum resolution of 800x600 is
the best in resolution, speed and price for work under Win 3.0?
I have tried an Optima 1024i (based on Tseng 3000K chipset) but it
seems to be rather slow.
Can you recommend the Genoa 6400 A, the Video-7 1024i, the Trident 512K,
......?
Thanks for every hint.
Thomas -
-------
Thomas Muhr, Technical University of Berlin, BITNET: muhrth@db0tui11
Project ATLAS - Computer Based Tools for Qualitative Research
"Computers, like every technology, are a vehicle
for the transformation of tradition." (WINOGRAD/FLORES)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90315.094056MUHRTH@DB0TUI11.BITNET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!unido!opal!db0tui11!muhrthShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!unido!opal!db0tui11!muhrth From: MUHRTH@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (Thomas Muhr) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Which graphics-adapter is best?` Message-ID: <90315.094056MUHRTH@DB0TUI11.BITNET> Date: 11 Nov 90 07:40:56 GMT Organization: Technical University Berlin Lines: 13