Article View: comp.windows.ms
Article #6886Re: Which graphics-adapter is best?`
From: In Sik Rhee
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 1990 22:55
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 1990 22:55
30 lines
1946 bytes
1946 bytes
In article <6452@gssc.UUCP> geoffs@gssc.UUCP (Geoff Shapiro) writes: >In article <1519@berlioz.nsc.com> my@berlioz.UUCP (Michael Yip) writes: >>Anyhow, the NEC Graphics Engine is a good card, but I would >>probably buy the Hercule one just to support the American >>inductrial. ;) >> >>-- Mike >> my@dtg.nsc.com > >My company designed the MGE for NEC and we wrote the software for it. By >buying a NEC MGE you ARE supporting American industry! Besides, how many >parts on the Hercules Graphics Station really were made in the good old >US of A anyway? > > Zap me if I'm wrong, but doesn't NEC stand for Nippon Electronics Corporation or something like that? It's one of the largest Japanese Electronics Firms out there... I don't see how buying a Japanese product would support American industry. As for Hercules, they're located about 2 miles from where I sit, right in Berkeley, CA. and to the best of my knowledge, their product (the Graphics Station) is far superior than the NEC Graphics Engine, which I think is becoming obsolete... True, the Graphics Engine is a standard, but it's been out in the market for a while... while it may have been a great innovation at its release, it hasn't really gone anywhere as far as newer implementations, etc (kind of like the Video-7 VRAM card) Just my opinions... I'm in no way affliated with Hercules, blah blah etc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov14.225552.4015@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!agate!web-1e!c60c-3fzReferences:
<1990Nov14.030313.16366@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1519@berlioz.nsc.com> <6452@gssc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!agate!web-1e!c60c-3fz From: c60c-3fz@web-1e.berkeley.edu (In Sik Rhee) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Which graphics-adapter is best?` Message-ID: <1990Nov14.225552.4015@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 14 Nov 90 22:55:52 GMT References: <1990Nov14.030313.16366@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1519@berlioz.nsc.com> <6452@gssc.UUCP> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator) Distribution: usa, na Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 30