Re: Which graphics-adapter is best?`

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #6975

#6975

From: Robert Krajewski
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 1990 22:51

11 lines
1181 bytes

Does anybody have any comments about the Renaissance GRX Rendition II
board ?  It seemed to benchmark well, but a PC maven acquaintance of
mine said it wasn't very good, that you could pick one up for $50 at
the local parts store.  I'm taking that statement with a rather large
grain of salt right now.

Also, what kind performance difference is there between a board based
on the TMS 34010 and one based in the newer 34020 chip ?
----
Robert P. Krajewski
Internet: rpk@ai.mit.edu ; Lotus: robert_krajewski.lotus@crd.dnet.lotus.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <11940@life.ai.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!pilot.njin.net!princeton!udel!wuarchive!mit-eddie!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!rice-chex!rpk

References: <1990Nov14.030313.16366@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1519@berlioz.nsc.com> <6452@gssc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!pilot.njin.net!princeton!udel!wuarchive!mit-eddie!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!rice-chex!rpk
From: rpk@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (Robert Krajewski)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which graphics-adapter is best?`
Summary: What about other TIGA/340x0 based boards ?
Keywords: TIGA, TMS 340x0
Message-ID: <11940@life.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 17 Nov 90 22:51:07 GMT
References: <1990Nov14.030313.16366@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1519@berlioz.nsc.com> <6452@gssc.UUCP>
Sender: news@ai.mit.edu
Distribution: usa, na
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message