🚀 go-pugleaf

From uwm.edu!rpi!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!trwind!venice!ries Fri Jan 11 12:04:04 CST 1991
Article: 8693 of comp.windows.ms
Path: uwm.edu!rpi!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!trwind!venice!ries
From: ries@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM (Marc Ries)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Review of the ATM fonts posted
Summary: not bad for free
Message-ID: <950@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM>
Date: 11 Jan 91 15:35:28 GMT
Reply-To: ries@venice.sedd.trw.com (Marc Ries)
Organization: N/A
Lines: 15


>  I got the three "ATM" Windows compatible fonts from cira, unzipped them, and
>  loaded them into ATM without a hitch or w/o doing anything else.
>  The "architect" font is very nice.  I also have Adobe's Tekton font.
>  Without close examination, they both look very equal.  For the price,
>  "architect" looks great.
>  The BlackChancery font appears to be a very nice "script/calligraphic" font
>  for those fancy occasions.
>  The SanFrancisco font is, well, weird.  It looks more like the "ransom"
>  font available for Metafont.  Not too useful except for blackmail 8-).

On my system the descender of the 'q' in Architect is noticeably thicker
than any part of any other character.  I'm running WIN3, ATM, and a H-P LJII
with an Adobe cartridge.  I was printing some samples of the fonts via
Windows Write.