Re: An IBM document..

Article View: comp.windows.ms

Article #86

#86

From: Steve Austin
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 15:29

21 lines
1087 bytes

TURGUT@FRMOP11.BITNET (Turgut Kalfaoglu) writes:

->I think this group would be concerned about this document. I found
->it on a local group.

->  RESPONSE TO MS DOCUMENT ON WINDOWS 3.1 VS OS/2

Um, isn't this just a IBM marketing document.  It doesn't give much
techincal infomation and mainly seems to whining about MicroSoft's
marketing hype.  We should really try to limit marketing guff
on Usenet.

	Steve Austin

P.S. I really liked the part about:

>      In addition, we're continually working to improve performance.
> In the fall, we're planning to improve performance for all systems,
> but especially those with the minimum configuration of 4MB RAM.

since I almost got suckered into buying OS/2 for my 4Mb machine.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <l708f4INNg99@news.bbn.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!news.bbn.com!saustin

References: <92205.145421TURGUT@FRMOP11.BITNET>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!news.bbn.com!saustin
From: saustin@bbn.com (Steve Austin)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: An IBM document..
Date: 24 Jul 1992 15:29:40 GMT
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <l708f4INNg99@news.bbn.com>
References: <92205.145421TURGUT@FRMOP11.BITNET>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bbn.com

Reply to Parent Message