Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1

Thread View: comp.windows.news

3 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

3 total messages Started by Peter Pui Tak Chiu Mon, 10 Aug 1992 17:31

#25

Author: Peter Pui Tak Chiu
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1992 17:31

22 lines
895 bytes


Hi everyone,

does anyone know if Stacker 2.0 is compatible with Smartdrv 4.0 of Windows 3.1?

that is, if i install Stacker, can i still cache the stacked drive?

when i read the readme.wri in windows directory, it says
superstor is not compatible with smartdrv.

that means you can't cache the drive that is superstored

is that true for stacker 2.0 also?

please give me some advice

thanks .... 

oh.. i am using a 486-33, 256K cache, 8M ram... if that helps

pete

Re: Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1

#400

Author: Lupe Christoph
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1992 14:28

35 lines
1597 bytes

ppc1@cec1.wustl.edu (Peter Pui Tak Chiu) writes:



>Hi everyone,

>does anyone know if Stacker 2.0 is compatible with Smartdrv 4.0 of Windows 3.1?

>that is, if i install Stacker, can i still cache the stacked drive?

>when i read the readme.wri in windows directory, it says
>superstor is not compatible with smartdrv.

>that means you can't cache the drive that is superstored

>is that true for stacker 2.0 also?

>please give me some advice

>thanks .... 

>oh.. i am using a 486-33, 256K cache, 8M ram... if that helps

>pete

I'd be very much interested how you got Solaris 2.0 for your 486.
You must have it, as you are running OpenWindows 3.1, and
it's the only way to get NeWS on a Intel architecture currently.

BTW, what's Stacker and Smartdrv?
-- 
| ...!unido!ukw!lupe  (German EUNet, "bang")     |  Disclaimer:            |
| lupe@ukw.UUCP       (German EUNet, domain)     |  As I am self-employed, |
| suninfo!alanya!lupe (Sun Germany)              |  this *is* the opinion  |
| Res non sunt complicanda praeter necessitatem. |  of my employer.        |

news vs. xnews (Was Re: Stacker 2.0 and Windows 3.1)

#404

Author: Richard Campbell
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1992 12:59

2 lines
568 bytes

Perhaps it's time the newsgroup named was changed from
comp.windows.news to comp.windows.xnews?

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads