Re: Time to put up or shut up

Article View: comp.windows.x.pex

Article #129

Back to comp.windows.x.pex Previous Next

#129

From: Allen Akin
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 17:27

14 lines
1019 bytes

In article <1992Aug20.172200.17418@dsd.es.com> rpimente@es.com (Richard Pimentel) writes:
| 
| I am sorry for dragging this discussion back from the technical and into
| the inflamatory but I have reached the end of my patience. ...
| [Flame about lack of PLB numbers from SGI]

If I had to guess, I'd say that SGI hasn't pursued the PLB because it
hasn't made a difference to sales.  If PLB numbers were prerequisites
for some significant number of purchase orders, the company would work
on them more aggressively.

This is strictly my uninformed opinion, not an official position of SGI.

Allen

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ortnla8@fido.asd.sgi.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!sgigate!odin!fido!akin

References: <1992Aug20.172200.17418@dsd.es.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!sgigate!odin!fido!akin
From: akin@sgi.com (Allen Akin)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.pex
Subject: Re: Time to put up or shut up
Keywords: benchmarks NCGA GPC
Message-ID: <ortnla8@fido.asd.sgi.com>
Date: 21 Aug 92 17:27:06 GMT
References: <1992Aug20.172200.17418@dsd.es.com>
Sender: news@fido.asd.sgi.com (Usenet News Admin)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message