Article View: comp.windows.x.pex
Article #136Question concerning sunPHIGS and PEX-SI, open_ws, open_phigs calls
From: Matthias Pfuetzner
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:46
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 13:46
105 lines
4954 bytes
4954 bytes
Hi Everybody!
I again have a question concerning PEX-SI as supplied with X11R5 from MIT and
sunPHIGS from SunSoft.
Is there a real difference between the two following codes, and if yes, what
are these?
CODE 1:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
grafik_display = XOpenDisplay( display_name );
xswa.backing_store = NotUseful;
xswa.event_mask = ExposureMask | StructureNotifyMask;
xswa.override_redirect = True;
visual.visualid = CopyFromParent;
grafik_window =
XCreateWindow( grafik_display,
RootWindow( grafik_display,
DefaultScreen( grafik_display ) ),
0,
0,
DisplayWidth( grafik_display,
DefaultScreen( grafik_display ) ),
DisplayHeight( grafik_display,
DefaultScreen( grafik_display ) ),
(unsigned int)0,
DefaultDepth( grafik_display,
DefaultScreen( grafik_display ) ),
InputOutput,
&visual,
CWEventMask | CWBackingStore | CWBorderPixel |
CWOverrideRedirect,
&xswa );
XMapWindow( grafik_display, grafik_window );
XSync( grafik_display, False );
XWindowEvent( grafik_display, grafik_window, ExposureMask, &exposureEvent );
xinfo.display = grafik_display;
xinfo.flags.no_monitor = 0; /* False -> Monitor is running! */
popen_xphigs( NULL, 0, PXPHIGS_INFO_FLAGS_NO_MON |
PXPHIGS_INFO_DISPLAY, &xinfo );
conn.display = grafik_display;
conn.drawable_id = grafik_window;
popen_ws( 1, (Pconnid)(&conn), phigs_ws_type_x_drawable );
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CODE 2:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
grafik_display = XOpenDisplay( display_name );
xinfo.display = grafik_display;
popen_xphigs( NULL, 0, PXPHIGS_INFO_DISPLAY, &xinfo );
ws_type = phigs_ws_type_create( phigs_ws_type_x_tool,
(char *)PHIGS_TOOL_X,
(char *)0,
(char *)PHIGS_TOOL_Y,
(char *)0,
(char *)PHIGS_TOOL_WIDTH,
(char *)DisplayWidth( grafik_display,
DefaultScreen( grafik_display ) ),
(char *)PHIGS_TOOL_HEIGHT,
(char *)DisplayHeight( grafik_display,
DefaultScreen( grafik_display ) ),
(char *)PHIGS_TOOL_BORDER_WIDTH,
(char *)0,
(char *)0 );
popen_ws( 1, (char *)display_name, ws_type );
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My questions in special:
1.) Which code is prefered? Why?
2.) In the case of code 2, why do I have to use XOpenDisplay explicitly for
retrieving an argument for popen_xphigs, when I later have to specify (in
popen_ws) the display_name again?
3.) In case of code 2, does the popen_ws call use the existing connection to
the server, or does it open the display again?
4.) In case of code 2, should I add the options PHIGS_X_DISPLAY and
PHIGS_X_DISPLAY_NAME to the list of attributes in phigs_ws_type_create?
Would this adding of attributes allow me to remove the "(char *)
display_name" argument from the call to popen_ws?
5.) Are there differences in performance and behavior? If yes, which and why?
Thanks in advance!
Sincerly,
Matthias
--
Matthias Pfuetzner | @work: +49 6151 155-150 | @home: +49 6151 75717
6100 Darmstadt, FRG | ZGDV, Wilhelminenstrasse 7 | Lichtenbergstrasse 73
pfuetzner@igd.fhg.de, pfuetzner@zgdvda.UUCP | Hans-Ulrich Klose sagte:
Wir pfeifen nicht nach ihrer Tanze... (09.09.92 in der Haushaltsdebatte)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1502@igd.fhg.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!fhg!igd!pfuetzShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!fhg!igd!pfuetz From: pfuetz@igd.fhg.de (Matthias Pfuetzner) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.pex,comp.sys.sun.misc Subject: Question concerning sunPHIGS and PEX-SI, open_ws, open_phigs calls Keywords: phigs, sunPHIGS, PEX, PEX-SI, popen_phigs, popen_xphigs, phigs_ws_type_create, popen_ws Message-ID: <1502@igd.fhg.de> Date: 11 Sep 92 13:46:15 GMT Sender: news@igd.fhg.de Followup-To: poster Organization: Zentrum fuer Graphische Datenverarbeitung, Darmstadt, FRG Lines: 105