Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #24886Re: X, ISDN, and mid-range laptops: a good mix?
From: Dr Alexander J Annala
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 16:29
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 16:29
48 lines
2864 bytes
2864 bytes
>our group is considering the purchase of several laptops >... basic characteristics: active matrix display, 500+ Mb >hard disk, 486 DX4 75+ MHz, 16Mb RAM ... to run X windows >... and ... to connect to our UNIX systems via external >(probably) ISDN modems. Well, if you are just talking about running a decent X11R5 server, your processor, ram, and hard drive space are just fine. Moreover, for most X applications which can be done reasonably well over a dialup link, the absence of serious hardware acceleration in your display system will not kill this application. Frankly, SCO UNIX and X11 can be run on a "properly tuned" 386-33, 8 mb ram, 200 mb hard disk box with more or less completely unaccelerated ET-4000 video card -- this configuration doesn't lack any noticable kind of responsiveness on a direct 10BaseT ethernet (100KBPS+). Unfortunately, I've not visited many hotel rooms, company guest houses, or homes with 56KBPS or 112KBPS ISDN jacks. The main advantage of notebook system (portability) might disappear if you tie yourelf to ISDN tranport. With good quality modems you get 14.4KBPS (and sometimes 28.8KBPS) on analog dialup. Moreover, with hardware compression a virtual X11 data stream will actually transport a bit more quickly over the 14.4KBPS link. I wouldn't count on going much faster on a hotel (or company guest office/residence) telephone jack. X11 Xterm is tolerable at this speed; and things wih static displays like netscape main windows will work just fine -- don't try to do animation or remote CAD. >Aside from the pitifully small screen, are there any >counterindications to using these machines as X terminals? Yes -- get it in writing that the specific model and serial port you want to use will perform as expected. My Thinkpad 750Cs has slow (19.2KBPS) 8250 UARTS (not the fast [114KBPS] 16550AF UARTS) on the stock serial ports. IBM's high speed data/fax modem PCMCIA card has an on board 16550AF -- but an external 28.8 modem will not be able to transmit 28.8 KBPS (much less a virtual compressed data stream which may peak at 114KBPS) through the serial port on IBM Thinkpad 750Cs. The small screen is OK. You can do decent X11 work on 640 x480 pixel screen. Some X servers also offer the option of rolling this 640x480 window around in a 1024x768 virtual screen space -- the video is not the serious limitation. AJ Annala
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1995Oct14.162953.21941@ucl.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk!ucklw08References:
<45c884$86t@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.sys.laptops,comp.dcom.isdn Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk!ucklw08 From: ucklw08@ucl.ac.uk (Dr Alexander J Annala) Subject: Re: X, ISDN, and mid-range laptops: a good mix? Sender: news@ucl.ac.uk (Usenet News System) Message-ID: <1995Oct14.162953.21941@ucl.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 16:29:53 GMT References: <45c884$86t@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: Bloomsbury Computing Consortium