Re: Short paper comparing X with NeWS

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #24919

#24919

From: carlson
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1987 20:35

13 lines
1072 bytes

In article <2479@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> oster@lapis.berkeley.edu.UUCP (David Phillip Oster) writes:
>Take that paper with a boulder of salt. It concluded that X was better
>than NEWS using the following (idiotic) argument:
> [...etc]

Seems to be a lack of understanding on both sides of the sandbox...

BTW, I have heard of a paper listing the advantages of NeWS over X.  Can
someone send me a copy?  Does it exist?

John Carlson
ARPA: carlson@lll-tis-b.arpa
UUCP: lll-crg!styx!carlson

Technical Details

Message-ID: <21240@styx.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!husc6!seismo!styx!carlson

References: <4791@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> <2479@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!husc6!seismo!styx!carlson
From: carlson@styx.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Short paper comparing X with NeWS
Message-ID: <21240@styx.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Feb-87 15:35:57 EST
Article-I.D.: styx.21240
Posted: Tue Feb 10 15:35:57 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Feb-87 19:42:28 EST
References: <4791@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> <2479@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: carlson@styx.UUCP (John Carlson)
Organization: Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore CA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message