X atoms, a poll

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #24933

#24933

From: Moon
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1987 20:46

6 lines
969 bytes

I don't see any strong reason to think that using Lisp keywords to
represent X atoms would be more efficient or more desirable than
using Lisp strings.  There is a hash-table-based translation between
the Lisp and X worlds in either case.  If you use strings, you don't
have to worry about mapping between two different casing/punctuating
conventions.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <870213154626.1.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM!Moon

References: <870213093807.6.RWS@KILLINGTON.LCS.MIT.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM!Moon
From: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: X atoms, a poll
Message-ID: <870213154626.1.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Fri, 13-Feb-87 15:46:00 EST
Article-I.D.: EUPHRATE.870213154626.1.MOON
Posted: Fri Feb 13 15:46:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Feb-87 14:39:05 EST
References: <870213093807.6.RWS@KILLINGTON.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message