Re: Uwm extensions, perhaps?

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #24977

#24977

From: wohler
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1987 19:46

13 lines
1061 bytes

In article <8702211303.AA01735@gjetost.wisc.edu> solomon@GJETOST.WISC.EDU (Marvin Solomon) writes:
>What's the solution?  

  for applications to be cognizant of uwm and vice-versa.  i agree,
  the key bindings can be confusing.

>For example, have sensitive areas on borders of
>windows that can be used to resize them;

  please, no!  not having to go to the namestripe or border is one of
  the features that makes x a "faster" system than suntools.

			    				--bw

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9884@sri-spam.istc.sri.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!styx!ames!sri-spam!wohler

References: <8702211303.AA01735@gjetost.wisc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!styx!ames!sri-spam!wohler
From: wohler@sri-spam.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re:  Uwm extensions, perhaps?
Message-ID: <9884@sri-spam.istc.sri.com>
Date: Mon, 23-Feb-87 14:46:07 EST
Article-I.D.: sri-spam.9884
Posted: Mon Feb 23 14:46:07 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 26-Feb-87 20:49:33 EST
References: <8702211303.AA01735@gjetost.wisc.edu>
Reply-To: wohler@sri-spam.UUCP (Bill Wohler)
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message