Re: Why is the ScreenSaver braindamaged?

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #25039

#25039

From: jg
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1987 17:46

8 lines
822 bytes

The V10 screen saver was trivial to implement with no overhead.  Feel free
to fix it....

The V11 implementation only triggers screen saver on lack of keyboard
and mouse input.

"Fixed in next major release"
				Jim Gettys

Technical Details

Message-ID: <744@jumbo.dec.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!jumbo!jg

References: <4797@ut-ngp.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!jumbo!jg
From: jg@jumbo.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Why is the ScreenSaver braindamaged?
Message-ID: <744@jumbo.dec.com>
Date: Tue, 3-Mar-87 12:46:20 EST
Article-I.D.: jumbo.744
Posted: Tue Mar  3 12:46:20 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Mar-87 03:59:46 EST
References: <4797@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Reply-To: jg@jumbo.UUCP (Jim Gettys)
Organization: DEC Systems Research Center
Lines: 8
Keywords: X screen saver is useless

Reply to Parent Message