Re: X on a Sun-3/110?

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #25114

#25114

From: ken
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1987 01:13

13 lines
1129 bytes

Well, the problem is that X support is strongest for Vax architectures
and indeed X 0 0 is what you would type there. To be fair, it says in
the installation manual that Xinit is what you should look at. Although
no hint is given that Xsun should be linked to X.

Another place the Vax bias shows is in the nil deref bugs in client
code.

I hope some site (Berkeley?) emerges as the Sun implementation support
site. Or at least a place to collect gripes. Sun Microsystems seems
bent on being different, so we Sun X users have to help each other.

	Ken

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8703132357.141@ur-seneca.arpa>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!CS.ROCHESTER.EDU!ken

References: <25919@rochester.ARPA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!CS.ROCHESTER.EDU!ken
From: ken@CS.ROCHESTER.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X on a Sun-3/110?
Message-ID: <8703132357.141@ur-seneca.arpa>
Date: Fri, 13-Mar-87 20:13:58 EST
Article-I.D.: ur-senec.8703132357.141
Posted: Fri Mar 13 20:13:58 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Mar-87 15:29:43 EST
References: <25919@rochester.ARPA>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message