Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #25173Re: X on MS-DOS?
From: speter
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1987 17:25
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1987 17:25
22 lines
1326 bytes
1326 bytes
In article <821@ci-dandelion.UUCP> jim@ci-dandelion.UUCP (Jim Fulton) writes: >Peter Osgood (speter@athena.mit.edu) writes: >> X does not work on MS-DOS. > >Oh really? > >This message is being written from an xterm that I popped onto one of the >PC/AT's sitting in my office. Cognition has had X running on MS-DOS for >over a year. > Yes, I believe you. It seems I have made a faux pas of major proportions. I beg of anyone who reads this net to totally disregard my previous posting regarding this subject in its entirety. It is full of mistakes. Also, anything which I said was of course out of my own ignorance. Please forgive? ---peter osgood---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<398@bacchus.MIT.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!bacchus!speterReferences:
<17364@ti-csl.CSNET> <387@bacchus.MIT.EDU> <821@ci-dandelion.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!bacchus!speter From: speter@bacchus.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: X on MS-DOS? Message-ID: <398@bacchus.MIT.EDU> Date: Mon, 30-Mar-87 12:25:57 EST Article-I.D.: bacchus.398 Posted: Mon Mar 30 12:25:57 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 31-Mar-87 06:55:56 EST References: <17364@ti-csl.CSNET> <387@bacchus.MIT.EDU> <821@ci-dandelion.UUCP> Sender: daemon@bacchus.MIT.EDU Reply-To: speter@athena.mit.edu (Peter Osgood) Organization: MIT Project Athena Lines: 22 Keywords: MS-DOS PC-DOS X