Re: The new Xtool distribution

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #25309

#25309

From: ken
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1987 16:08

8 lines
995 bytes

I wrote xtools and I agree it is a hack. As an X novice at that time I
was not aware of the ramifications of grabbing events from the root
window. It has served me well enough, though.  I might go over to Ed
Moy's xinit with startup file ~/.xinit (one less process). In any case
I have no further intention of doing anything more with xtools. Anybody
is welcome to trash it or improve it as they wish.

	Ken

Technical Details

Message-ID: <26697@rochester.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!rochester!ken

References: <8703262129.AA09221@brillig.umd.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!rochester!ken
From: ken@rochester.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: The new Xtool distribution
Message-ID: <26697@rochester.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 3-Apr-87 11:08:45 EST
Article-I.D.: rocheste.26697
Posted: Fri Apr  3 11:08:45 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 5-Apr-87 04:35:12 EST
References: <8703262129.AA09221@brillig.umd.edu>
Reply-To: ken@rochester.UUCP (Ken Yap)
Distribution: world
Organization: U of Rochester, CS Dept, Rochester, NY
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message