common lisp X interface

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #25437

#25437

From: "Scott E. Fahlman"
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1987 15:24

13 lines
1193 bytes

    This would appear to require that CL implementations in  unix environments
    be provided with a very low level (C based?) protocol interface upon
    which to build.
    Does anyone know what vendors like DEC, HP, and Sun are planning?

The Common Lisp language spec (current or proposed) does not require any
sort of call-out mechansism, but all of the vendors you name have some
sort of call-out from Common Lisp to C.  I'm not sure whether all of
them are general enough to support everything in the Xlib interface in a
convenient way, however.

-- Scott

Technical Details

Message-ID: <FAHLMAN.12294459782.BABYL@C.CS.CMU.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!C.CS.CMU.EDU!Fahlman

References: <janson.at.ATHENA.MIT.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!C.CS.CMU.EDU!Fahlman
From: Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU ("Scott E. Fahlman")
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: common lisp X interface
Message-ID: <FAHLMAN.12294459782.BABYL@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: Tue, 14-Apr-87 10:24:00 EST
Article-I.D.: C.FAHLMAN.12294459782.BABYL
Posted: Tue Apr 14 10:24:00 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 19-Apr-87 00:14:05 EST
References: <janson.at.ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message