Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #36724Insufficient functionality?
From: David L. Battle
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1990 19:21
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1990 19:21
10 lines
866 bytes
866 bytes
Given a Screen * is there a way to find out the cooresponding screen number? -David L. Battle battle@battle.esd.ornl.gov P. S. Please use the address in my signature. The address from which this message was posted will dissappear immediately after the message is sent. This is to keep random mailers from sending me mail for days and days complaining that they can't deliver mail to some one of the thousand or so people on xpert.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9002121921.AA01207@battle.ESD.ORNL.GOV>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!BATTLE.ESD.ORNL.GOV!battlewrShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!BATTLE.ESD.ORNL.GOV!battlewr From: battlewr@BATTLE.ESD.ORNL.GOV (David L. Battle) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Insufficient functionality? Message-ID: <9002121921.AA01207@battle.ESD.ORNL.GOV> Date: 12 Feb 90 19:21:06 GMT Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: The Internet Lines: 10