Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #36847Re: WM for Motif or is R4 twm ICCCM compliant
From: Tom LaStrange
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1990 23:27
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1990 23:27
34 lines
1700 bytes
1700 bytes
> 1) The manual specifies that Dialogs should always be iconified
> together with the toplevel window for the application. This does
> not work when using R4 twm but (of course) when I use the Motif
> windowmanager mwm.
>
>
> Why is this so? I can think of two reasons:
>
> - Motif is designed to always require mwm. And mwm does more than what
> is required by the ICCCM standard.
There is nothing in the ICCCM (at least that I could find) that says
that a transient should be removed from the display when the
transient_for window is iconified. Motif and mwm decided that this was
reasonable behavior, and I tend to agree with them even though it is
not spelled out in the ICCCM. And it's not just transient stuff either,
both Motif and Open Look specify a private protocol that their clients and
their window managers understand.
Are the two private protocols compatible?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I guess what you really need is a window manager that deals gracefully
with both Motif and Open Look clients and their private protocolisms.
Hmmmmm, don't I have one of those laying around someplace ...
Good Luck,
Tom LaStrange
Solbourne Computer Inc. ARPA: toml@Solbourne.COM
1900 Pike Rd. UUCP: ...!{boulder,sun}!stan!toml
Longmont, CO 80501
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Feb14.232707.1112@Solbourne.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!stan!ninja!tomlShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!stan!ninja!toml From: toml@ninja.Solbourne.COM (Tom LaStrange) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: WM for Motif or is R4 twm ICCCM compliant Message-ID: <1990Feb14.232707.1112@Solbourne.COM> Date: 14 Feb 90 23:27:07 GMT Sender: news@Solbourne.COM Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc. Lines: 34