Re: why so many xdms

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #36893

#36893

From: Keith Packard
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 18:52

12 lines
923 bytes

> We are running the X11R3 ... using 2 NCD16s ... there are always four xdms
> running in the background.

The R3 version of xdm created 2 processes per display for various arcane
reasons.  The R4 version was fixed to only use 1 process per display.  The R4
version also manages the remote displays much better, detecting when they're
turned off by "pinging" occasionally and doing a host of other useful
tasks.

Keith Packard
MIT X Consorium

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9002151852.AA03913@xenon.lcs.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!keith

References: <1990Feb14.224459.4545@hfh.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!keith
From: keith@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Keith Packard)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: why so many xdms
Message-ID: <9002151852.AA03913@xenon.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 15 Feb 90 18:52:47 GMT
References: <1990Feb14.224459.4545@hfh.edu>
Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message