Re: fix-2 gcc patch implications?

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #36955

#36955

From: Casey Leedom
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1990 01:23

9 lines
763 bytes

  The recently released version of GCC, 1.37, does NOT contain the

	"..." == 0 ? exp1 : exp2

bug exposed by the XtNewString macro.  GCC 1.37 also seems to be fairly
reliable in general, but I haven't recompiled all of R4 with it yet ...

Casey

Technical Details

Message-ID: <48966@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!gauss.llnl.gov!casey

References: <600@igor.Rational.COM> <9002151359.AA11401@expo.lcs.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!gauss.llnl.gov!casey
From: casey@gauss.llnl.gov (Casey Leedom)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: fix-2 gcc patch implications?
Message-ID: <48966@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>
Date: 17 Feb 90 01:23:00 GMT
References: <600@igor.Rational.COM> <9002151359.AA11401@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV
Reply-To: casey@gauss.llnl.gov (Casey Leedom)
Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message