Re: Why not distribute binaries?

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #37121

#37121

From: Richard Ottolini
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1990 17:58

4 lines
862 bytes

In article <1990Feb21.150131.10382@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> smith@darwin (Steven Smith) writes:
>Can someone tell me why MIT insists on shipping source only?  It seems to
Agreed!  How about stashing binaries for any workstation company with >10%
market share?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <470@med.Stanford.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!shelby!med!hanauma!rick

References: <1990Feb21.150131.10382@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!shelby!med!hanauma!rick
From: rick@hanauma.stanford.edu (Richard Ottolini)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Why not distribute binaries?
Keywords: X11 binaries
Message-ID: <470@med.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 21 Feb 90 17:58:54 GMT
References: <1990Feb21.150131.10382@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: news@med.stanford.edu (USENET News System)
Reply-To: rick@hanauma.UUCP (Richard Ottolini)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Stanford University, Dept. of Geophysics
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message