Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #37126WM_ICON_SIZE
From: tek
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1990 20:52
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1990 20:52
21 lines
1047 bytes
1047 bytes
How exactly do you interpret the WM_ICON_SIZE info?
Are the dimensions in pixels supposed to be:
width = min_width + i * width_increment
height = min_height + j * width_increment
with the constraints:
width <= max_width
height <= max_height
Do i and j have to be equal?
Is max_width constrained to be min_width plus some multiple of
width_increment?
If no, is the max_width a supported width?
-ted
Ted Kim
UCLA Computer Science Department Internet: tek@penzance.cs.ucla.edu
3804C Boelter Hall UUCP: ...!{uunet|ucbvax}!cs.ucla.edu!tek
Los Angeles, CA 90024 Phone: (213) 206-8696
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32148@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!tekShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!think!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!tek From: tek@penzance.cs.ucla.edu Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: WM_ICON_SIZE Message-ID: <32148@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Date: 21 Feb 90 20:52:39 GMT Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU Reply-To: tek@CS.UCLA.EDU (Ted Kim (Random Dude)) Organization: UCLA Lines: 21