xpert split, new xcontrib list ?

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #37225

#37225

From: Edward Vielmetti
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1990 23:00

18 lines
1129 bytes

There have been discussions of splitting xpert (comp.windows.x)
in the past, most of which have vetoed for one reason or another.

If there should be a split at some time in the future, I'd like
to suggest that it spin off the discussion of contributed software
from the X core discussion, i.e split xpert into xpert and xcontrib
(comp.windows.x.contrib).  xcontrib would take bug reports, release
announcements, usage questions, etc.

I'll take a straw poll by email (mail stuff to emv@math.lsa.umich.edu)
and summarize here.

A quick eyeballing of comp.windows.x right now shows
roughly 5 or 6 of the last 20 postings might have been suitable
for comp.windows.x.contrib.

--Ed

Technical Details

Message-ID: <EMV.90Feb22180007@duby.math.lsa.umich.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!emv
From: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: xpert split, new xcontrib list ?
Message-ID: <EMV.90Feb22180007@duby.math.lsa.umich.edu>
Date: 22 Feb 90 23:00:07 GMT
Sender: news@math.lsa.umich.edu
Organization: University of Michigan Math Dept., Ann Arbor MI.
Lines: 18