Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #37345Re: XView v. other toolkits, advice wanted
From: Martin Brunecky
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1990 02:35
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 1990 02:35
44 lines
2847 bytes
2847 bytes
In article <495@med.Stanford.EDU> rick@hanauma.UUCP (Richard Ottolini) writes:
>Our group decided to use either Xview or InterViews for the main
>reason is that they are entirely in public domain and run well ...
>First, history shows that public domain packages, UNIX (early AT&T, GNU C++)
>and X Windows win out over their possibility superior competitors
>(VMS, Objective C, NeWS) because academic hackers evolve them and write
>useful applications for them.
>
( complaints about OSF buerocracy deleted )
>
>It is still early. Our research group's funding is 90% industrial (Big Oil)
>which has nearly unanimously embraced Motif.
What does it mean "embraced Motif" ? Are we talking Motif Style
Guide OR it's first implementation, distributed by OSF ?
My feeling is that most companies endorse Motif STYLE/LOOK, for
the simple sake of ENDING the user interface battles. But I am
firmly convinced, that if someone puts into a PUBLIC DOMAIN a toolkit
compliant with Motif Style Guide ( preferably Xt based, but even
that may not be a requirement), we have a definitive winner.
In fact, there is nothing magic about Motif. About 30 widgets
plus bunch of support and convenience routines. Most of the Motif
widgets aren't any miracles.
So why not EVOLVE something like Xaw into Motif Style Guide
compliant tooolkit ? The functionality requirements are given,
the technology is known, and here is an opportunity to avoid
Motif implementation flaws and come up with a toolkit which
not only has a widely accepted look and feel, but which is also
OPEN - i.e. allows ANYBODY to improve/add functionality, new
widgets etc.
An alternative to Xt based toolkit is C++ (see for example
Solbourne OI). My personal preference, however, is Xt. I really
like the concept of resource database and many, many other
features ( the more I work with Xt, the more I like it - thank
you, Joel, Paul, Ralph and others ). Plus, you can use Xt based
toolkit from many languages, not just C or C++ only.
--
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
Martin Brunecky marbru@auto-trol.COM
(303) 252-2499 {...}ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru
Auto-trol Technology Corp. 12500 North Washington St., Denver, CO 80241-2404
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<744@auto-trol.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!uakari!xanth!ames!ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbruReferences:
<22697@mimsy.umd.edu> <7150@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> <495@med.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!uakari!xanth!ames!ncar!ico!auto-trol!marbru From: marbru@auto-trol.UUCP (Martin Brunecky) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: XView v. other toolkits, advice wanted Message-ID: <744@auto-trol.UUCP> Date: 25 Feb 90 02:35:01 GMT References: <22697@mimsy.umd.edu> <7150@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> <495@med.Stanford.EDU> Reply-To: marbru@auto-trol.COM (Martin Brunecky) Organization: Auto-trol Technology, Denver Lines: 44