Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #37534More Re: xdm vs. status 2817
From: Greg Earle - Sun JPL on-site Sof...
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1990 08:57
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1990 08:57
16 lines
1143 bytes
1143 bytes
In xpert I wrote: >`2817' is hex 0xB01. Translation: process died with signal 11 (SIGSEGV). It >did not leave a core dump (unfortunately). Apparently xdm ignores the Coredump bit in the wait struct before emitting the status value, so in all likelihood the child process probably did core dump. Thanks to Keith Packard for pointing this out to me. At least we both agreed that the child died from a Segmentation Violation, that makes me feel better :^) -- -- Greg Earle Sun Microsystems, Inc. - JPL on-site Software Support earle@poseur.JPL.NASA.GOV (direct) earle@Sun.COM (indirect)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9002270857.AA03048@poseur.jpl.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!POSEUR.JPL.NASA.GOV!earleReferences:
<9002251130.AA01156@poseur.jpl.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!POSEUR.JPL.NASA.GOV!earle From: earle@POSEUR.JPL.NASA.GOV (Greg Earle - Sun JPL on-site Software Support) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: More Re: xdm vs. status 2817 Message-ID: <9002270857.AA03048@poseur.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: 27 Feb 90 08:57:57 GMT References: <9002251130.AA01156@poseur.jpl.nasa.gov> Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: Sun Microsystems - JPL on-site Software Support Lines: 16