Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #37708internet address as DISPLAY host field on local machine
From: David B. Rosen
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 03:02
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1990 03:02
14 lines
1230 bytes
1230 bytes
I have a question about the DISPLAY. If the display is local, so no
host field need be specified, is it less efficient if the host name or
internet address *is* specified? That is, does this force all i/o
through network protocols or something even though the display is
local? For example, is it *better* to use `:0.0' than `myws:0.0' as
the DISPLAY varible value for the local display on myws?
Another question: what is the difference between using `unix:0.0' and
simply `:0.0'. Is the latter faster?
--
--
David B Rosen, Cognitive & Neural Systems rosen@bucasb.bu.edu
Center for Adaptive Systems rosen%bucasb@{buacca,bu-it}.bu.edu
Boston University {mit-eddie,harvard,uunet}!bu.edu!thalamus!rosen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ROSEN.90Mar5220252@cochlea.bu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!bu.edu!nntp-xfer.bu.edu!rosenShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!bu.edu!nntp-xfer.bu.edu!rosen From: rosen@cochlea.bu.edu (David B. Rosen) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: internet address as DISPLAY host field on local machine Message-ID: <ROSEN.90Mar5220252@cochlea.bu.edu> Date: 6 Mar 90 03:02:52 GMT Sender: news@bu.edu.bu.edu Distribution: comp Organization: Boston University Center for Adaptive Systems Lines: 14