Re: XView config problem in SunOS 3.5

Article View: comp.windows.x

Article #37945

#37945

From: Marco Papa
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 1990 03:08

12 lines
895 bytes

In article <132813@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> and LOTS of other articles, hvr@sun.UUCP 
(Heather Rose) writes:
[text omitted ...]

Maybe we should rename comp.windows.x as comp.windows.xview :-) Seriously,
if the volume on xview mantains at these levels, shouldn't a separate group
be in order?

-- Marco
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"Xerox sues somebody for copying?" -- David Letterman
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Technical Details

Message-ID: <23394@usc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!pollux.usc.edu!papa

References: <104@sam.ists.ca> <132813@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!pollux.usc.edu!papa
From: papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: XView config problem in SunOS 3.5
Message-ID: <23394@usc.edu>
Date: 11 Mar 90 03:08:50 GMT
References: <104@sam.ists.ca> <132813@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Organization: USC- ACSC
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message