Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #37952Re: XView application without olcursor?
From: der Mouse
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 1990 07:55
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 1990 07:55
17 lines
1178 bytes
1178 bytes
>>> This is a valid request for change--if the toolkit cannot find the >>> OpenLook fonts, it loads in bitmap data and uses that instead. The >>> only problem we would have with this is increasing the library size. >>I thought shared libraries eliminated the problems associated with >>growing a library, at least by small amounts (like this). > You still increase size to handle two cases for rendering. A size > increase is a size increase whether you have shared libraries or not. Well yes, but a size increase of 2K (say) would likely be tolerable whereas a size increase of 2K * number-of-XView-binaries probably would not. der Mouse old: mcgill-vision!mouse new: mouse@larry.mcrcim.mcgill.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9003110755.AA20288@Larry.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!LARRY.MCRCIM.MCGILL.EDU!mouseShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!LARRY.MCRCIM.MCGILL.EDU!mouse From: mouse@LARRY.MCRCIM.MCGILL.EDU (der Mouse) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: XView application without olcursor? Message-ID: <9003110755.AA20288@Larry.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> Date: 11 Mar 90 07:55:48 GMT Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: The Internet Lines: 17