Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #38053Re: Bug in img 1.2 - exhibit.c and maint_back.c
From: Paul Raveling
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 1990 01:59
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 1990 01:59
26 lines
1219 bytes
1219 bytes
In article <108@sam.ists.ca>, mike@sam.ists.ca (Mike Clarkson) writes: |> |> In X.V11R4/contrib/clients/new/img/imgprogs/exhibit |> |> there are defines like |> |> #ifndef hpux |> #define volatile "" |> #endif |> |> and then the use of vaolatile as a data type. Gcc 1.35 doesn't like this. I'll fix this blunder in V1.3 to make that a null operand instead of a null string. Until then folks with Suns & such will need to make that change manually. Something about BSDish systems needing to change this seems some sort of justice. Or to put it another way, how many getcwd() calls have you BSD-based people had to change? We HP-UXers have to recode a fair number of getwd()'s. ---------------- Paul Raveling Raveling@isi.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12379@venera.isi.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!venera.isi.edu!ravelingReferences:
<108@sam.ists.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!venera.isi.edu!raveling From: raveling@isi.edu (Paul Raveling) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Bug in img 1.2 - exhibit.c and maint_back.c Message-ID: <12379@venera.isi.edu> Date: 14 Mar 90 01:59:51 GMT References: <108@sam.ists.ca> Sender: news@venera.isi.edu Reply-To: raveling@isi.edu (Paul Raveling) Organization: USC Information Sciences Institute Lines: 26