Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #38079Re: How to justify X terminals to upper management??
From: gjc
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 1990 09:33
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 1990 09:33
30 lines
1571 bytes
1571 bytes
In article <LARRY.90Mar8212600@pocus.uucp>, larry@pocus.uucp (Larry Williamson) writes: > But I need some quantitative analysis of their benefits. > What measurable value do they provide *you* with. > The best way to justify hardware is that you need it to run some software that you need to run. Some desk-top publishing software is currently X-based. Some spreadsheet products are now X-based, and you could look to those vendors for a comparison of the increased functionality and benefits of the X-based mode over the character-cell mode of operation. Then there are various graphics-intensive and data-visualization packages. Other than sort of thing you are probably going to have to look at the COST parameters. e.g. * Next time somebody says they need a workstation to run Program-XYZ, just like Joe is running Program-XYZ on *his* workstation, Suggest to management: No, get an X-terminal instead, and since Joe has a 10-Mip workstation it should be able to support *two* users. Unfortunately then Joe loses his status-symbol of having his own machine. * Start things in the back-door by first purchasing some of the lower cost X-window terminals, e.g. the small-screen stuff. -gjc
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1206@mitech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!mitech!gjcReferences:
<LARRY.90Mar8212600@pocus.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!samsung!mitech!gjc From: gjc@mitech.com Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: How to justify X terminals to upper management?? Message-ID: <1206@mitech.com> Date: 14 Mar 90 09:33:02 GMT References: <LARRY.90Mar8212600@pocus.uucp> Organization: Mitech Corporation, Concord MA Lines: 30