Article View: comp.windows.x
Article #25149Re: X on Xenix/386
From: dyer
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1987 14:35
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1987 14:35
20 lines
1569 bytes
1569 bytes
>NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! DO NOT COUNT ON X ONLY RUNNING ON 4.X MACHINES!!!!!
>
>We have ported X to System V Xenix/386, and intend on doing more of the
>similar. If you want your application to run in all environments, follows
>standard "portable code" procedures and use generic calls, or use ifdefs, etc.
I'd like to know what IPC model(s) you chose for implementing X on System V
Xenix/386. Do you rely on external network cards like the Excelan TCP/IP
board for all the IPC? I had understood that using their on-board 'sockets'
for IPC within a single machine was unusually inefficient (warning, this
was gleaned from an Excelan techie at Uniforum, and not from direct experience.)
Do you optimize intramachine operations using System V facilities like
shared memory?
Finally, my Intel 386 card is coming soon; once I get my hands on SCO's
386 Xenix, how can I then obtain X?
--
Steve Dyer
dyer@harvard.HARVARD.EDU
dyer@spdcc.COM aka {linus,wanginst,bbnccv,harvard,ima,ihnp4}!spdcc!dyer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<526@spdcc.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!husc6!harvard!spdcc!dyerReferences:
<8702152056.AA17802@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu> <267@gssc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!husc6!harvard!spdcc!dyer From: dyer@spdcc.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: X on Xenix/386 Message-ID: <526@spdcc.COM> Date: Tue, 17-Feb-87 09:35:33 EST Article-I.D.: spdcc.526 Posted: Tue Feb 17 09:35:33 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 18-Feb-87 04:08:29 EST References: <8702152056.AA17802@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu> <267@gssc.UUCP> Reply-To: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA Lines: 20