🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Roger Schmeltz Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00
No vote on Meadowlark annexation!
#57
Author: Roger Schmeltz
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00
38 lines
2284 bytes
Here is a copy of another letter submitted to GT by another resident of SW
45th street.


Another annexation in southwest Corvallis, so soon?  No, in fact
Corvallis voters are being presented with two annexations - an
industrial park and a subdivision of 31 homes.  Why do we need
another 83 acres of industrial land, when there are well over 400
acres of vacant industrial land already within the city limits?  

Why should we add 5.37 acres of land for residential development,
when there are about 1,300 acres of such land inside the city
limits?  In fact, city approval to build on many of these parcels
has been obtained by developers, but they have chosen to delay
construction.  The demand and need for housing is obviously not
as great as some claim, or these lands would not still be vacant.

Annexations for large subdivisions seem endless in west, and
southwest, Corvallis, yet this corner of the city has been
seriously shortchanged when it comes to parks.  The existing
Comprehensive Plan notes a shortage of neighborhood and community
parks, and includes a policy that land for parks should be
acquired in advance of urban growth and development. 
Nonetheless, the City Council approved all these annexations
without seriously addressing the matter of parks.  

In the City's opinion, this area is adequately served by Starker
Arts Park and Sunset Park. I am not convinced that three softball
fields comprise any kind of a "park," in the normal sense of the
word.  As for the Arts Park, while dandy for rock concerts, it
has none of the usual amenities of the better city parks,
although it does have five picnic tables, two portable toilets
and a duck pond with water unsafe for swimming or wading.

Let's defeat both these annexations, and hope future
developments, under the new Comprehensive Plan, will address the
needs of current residents. 
Re: No vote on Meadowlark annexation!
#58
Author: DJ Dre
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00
22 lines
1332 bytes
As for the parsk....?

>>> As for the Arts Park, while dandy for rock concerts, it has none of the
usual amenities of the better city parks, although it does have five picnic
tables, two portable toilets and a duck pond with water unsafe for swimming or
wading. <<<

It just goes to show, that when folks don't like an issue, they will throw up
anything they can in its way.  This arguement is a good exampl.

I think Starker Arts Park is a fine park.  No, it's not as large as say...
Avery Park.  But one park cannot be all things to all people.

Regardless... the points made that I am drawn to is the drainage issue, and the
vote issues.  4 to 4 in both Planning Commission *and* City Council... both
needing the deciding vote to sway it?

I'm leaning towards voting no.
But I may have to chat with a some folks that are
on the Planning Commission, to get a better idea.

Andre
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads