🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DBxFpH.K35@draco.macsch.com>, jjw@denver.dev.macsch.com 
says...
>
>It is a courageous trip for Mr. Harry Wu to go back to China a few weeks 
>ago. He was already a well-known figure and it was clear that a journey
>to China would be extremely dangerous under the current situation. He
>is no doubt a hero. You may call his action a revenge. However he has
>shown the guts to take actions for millions innocent Chinese who died or 
>have been tortured in Chinese labor camps for political or simply no. 
>reasons. It is incomprehensible for me that how someone like you could 
feel 
>comfortable to wear a pair of socks or shoes that were made by Chinese
>coolies back to Chinese labor camps? What kind of Chinese job security 
you
>were talking about? It seems to me that you were telling the world that
>come to China to abuse Chinese because Chinese can take more abuse 
simply 
>for jobs of a few cents an hour. You have to get yourself clear that the
>winners in the games of poor Chinese working conditions are corrupt CCP 
>officials and American importers/exporters, not your poor Chinese 
workers.
>Why it is wrong for Mr. Wu to testify the truth in front of Congress? 
You 
>are not a businessman. Why do you choose the side of corrupt Chinese
>officials and American importers/exporters?
> 
like all developing countries, the labour cost in china is very low. it 
is a fact that people are ready to work for a few cents an hour under 
poor conditions (probably even worse than that of the chain gangs). one 
of the reasons of adopting the open policy is to make full use of china's 
huge human resource by introducing foreign capital. so far, as many as 6 
million jobs have been created, largely in export-oriented sectors. could 
any one in the world have the a better idea to solve china's employment 
problem? if you are one of the workers there, i wonder which side would 
you choose? that of the US confressmen? do you believe their really care 
about poor chinese workers? a safer way is not to choose any of them? it 
seems to me that
low labour cost = abuse, poor chinese workers = coolies, coolies = labour 
camps, and labour camp = deaths and tortures of millions for political or 
simply no reasons.