Article View: crl.general
Article #38Re: Modem gripe (WAS: CRL's modems)
From: 0000-Admin(0000)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:00
30 lines
1470 bytes
1470 bytes
Philip J. Koenig (pjk@aimnet.com) wrote: : >In order of preference: : : > 1. US Robotics Courier V.34+ : > 2. US Robotics Sportster V.34+ : > 3. See 1. and 2. : > 4. Didn't you read number 3? : Re: #2 : : I guess you haven't been reading comp.dcom.modems lately Paul? : : (I agree w/ #1) No, S:N ratio in c.d.m. is too low for me. I'm aware of assorted problems with the earlier V.34+ ROM revs (before we started buying USR Digital modem racks, we used a fair number of sportsters, and got hit once with a shipment of 50 V.34+ modems, of which 26 went DAD [dead after deployment] within a month). But I haven't kept up on any current complaints. So far as I know, the current Sportster V.34+ modems are adequate for end-user applications... -- Paul Theodoropoulos admin@wco.com Vice President West Coast Online, Inc. The Nicest Guy on the Internet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4uit25$hr5@news.wco.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4ug290$i8a@crl10.crl.com> <4uie7s$ean@news.wco.com> <4uipuf$841@news.aimnet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1120a5,287fc44b452a815c X-Google-Attributes: gid1120a5,public X-Google-Thread: fa874,287fc44b452a815c X-Google-Attributes: gidfa874,public From: paul@wco.com (0000-Admin(0000)) Subject: Re: Modem gripe (WAS: CRL's modems) Date: 1996/08/10 Message-ID: <4uit25$hr5@news.wco.com> X-Deja-AN: 173428058 references: <4ug290$i8a@crl10.crl.com> <4uie7s$ean@news.wco.com> <4uipuf$841@news.aimnet.com> organization: West Coast Online, Inc. followup-to: crl.general,ba.internet newsgroups: crl.general,ba.internet