Article View: cs.forum
Article #19Re: Q about Ram?
From: I'm a good man
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 00:00
14 lines
1185 bytes
1185 bytes
Chi On New Channel �Ӧw �s�W�D (cochan@cs.cuhk.hk) wrote: : 2. if you plan to trade in your RAMs in the future, the small size : RAMs are easier to trade. Therefore 4 x 4M are even better than Why? : 3. I think that if both RAMs are of the same speed, then the performance : should be the same. 2 x 8M == 1 x 16M. Right? But remember that one 16MB is cheaper than 2 8MB. And I tend to think 4 8MB perform better than 2 16MB. What do u think? Rgds, Ah Fung (NSR PGM II) (I can't read big5 easily. Thks!)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4j2l2l$kb@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4j0mv4$6j@eng_ser1.erg.cuhk.hk> <4j1eqn$7om@eng_ser1.erg.cuhk.hk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 117211,f8fec66b99b97992 X-Google-Attributes: gid117211,public X-Google-Thread: f4db5,f8fec66b99b97992 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4db5,public X-Google-Thread: 137f9b,f8fec66b99b97992 X-Google-Attributes: gid137f9b,public From: s936067@sgiind02.csc.cuhk.hk (I'm a good man) Subject: Re: Q about Ram? Date: 1996/03/24 Message-ID: <4j2l2l$kb@hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk> X-Deja-AN: 143959829 references: <4j0mv4$6j@eng_ser1.erg.cuhk.hk> <4j1eqn$7om@eng_ser1.erg.cuhk.hk> organization: CUIA <See U in the Net!> followup-to: hk.comp.pc newsgroups: cs.forum,hk.comp.pc,cuhk.csc.forum