Article View: csu.cs.200
Article #104Re: #define MAX(), DNM and a working program?
From: Chris Carlson
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 00:00
18 lines
1538 bytes
1538 bytes
Adam Carheden wrote: > No, my Rect. is tomorrow, but in case I don't go, are they overriding > the "...must work without changing any code in the main program..."? > Am I correct in guessing that it shouldn't really matter since the > implementation of the ADTs would be the same with the original or > modified Main4.C? Your are correct in that it shouldn't matter, becuase your ADT implementation should work with both the modified and original Main4.C. If they want us to use aCC then we have to ignore the "...must work without changing any code in the main program..." and modify Main4.C. I believe my recitation TA said that Van is changing the code for Main4.C and future assignments to work with aCC, but that we would have to make the changes to Main4.C ourselves if we wanted to use aCC. -- Chris Carlson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<361C2072.AE03724A@holly.colostate.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3619BA92.A76AECE5@holly.colostate.edu> <361A3923.E6CA7C51@holly.colostate.edu> <361BC00C.C00C37B0@holly.colostate.edu> <361BFCD2.C2222623@holly.colostate.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 127144,b0bd8a3d32c829be X-Google-Attributes: gid127144,public From: Chris Carlson <spasm@holly.colostate.edu> Subject: Re: #define MAX(), DNM and a working program? Date: 1998/10/07 Message-ID: <361C2072.AE03724A@holly.colostate.edu> X-Deja-AN: 398852641 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3619BA92.A76AECE5@holly.colostate.edu> <361A3923.E6CA7C51@holly.colostate.edu> <361BC00C.C00C37B0@holly.colostate.edu> <361BFCD2.C2222623@holly.colostate.edu> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: csu.cs.200