🚀 go-pugleaf

Okay, never mind about the third one (working program).  I was writing
my put function as an insert function.  That's what I get for asking my
brain to preform that late.  Anyway, if anyone's interested, I do have a
working program now, so, as expected, Van's Main4.C is just find of
course.

The other two questions (MAX() and DNM) are still unanswered though, so
if you have any thoughts or ideas, speak now.

One more too.  aCC is still giving the same errors I think, so we're
supposed to use CC for this assignment still, right?
-- 
Adam
carheden@holly.colostate.edu
http://holly.ColoState.edu/~carheden

--------------038EC89E25BC250F1B0FC93E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't know about the DNM, but the #define in Main4.C is an inline
function.  This is also used to define things like constants (ie. #define
MAX_SIZE 300).

I do have a working program, so I think you can rule out any error in the
Main4.C file.  What compiler are you trying?  I used CC not aCC.

Jamison Deba

Adam Carheden wrote:

> Does anyone know what the #define MAX() statement is all about in
> Main4.C (I'm just curious).  The book only lists define with respect to
> macro guarding.
>
> Also, does it matter if we use the DNM?
>
> Finally, does anyone have a correctly working program?  The sort
> function adds multiple nodes for the same name in my program and I'm
> stumped.  I just want to completely rule out an error in the Main4.C
> file, so if your program works, speak up!
>
> TIA
> --
> Adam
> carheden@holly.colostate.edu

--------------038EC89E25BC250F1B0FC93E
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
I don't know about the DNM, but the #define in Main4.C is an inline function.&nbsp;
This is also used to define things like constants (ie. <I>#define MAX_SIZE
300</I>).
<P>I do have a working program, so I think you can rule out any error in
the Main4.C file.&nbsp; What compiler are you trying?&nbsp; I used CC not
aCC.
<P>Jamison Deba
<P>Adam Carheden wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>Does anyone know what the #define MAX() statement
is all about in
<BR>Main4.C (I'm just curious).&nbsp; The book only lists define with respect
to
<BR>macro guarding.
<P>Also, does it matter if we use the DNM?
<P>Finally, does anyone have a correctly working program?&nbsp; The sort
<BR>function adds multiple nodes for the same name in my program and I'm
<BR>stumped.&nbsp; I just want to completely rule out an error in the Main4.C
<BR>file, so if your program works, speak up!
<P>TIA
<BR>--
<BR>Adam
<BR>carheden@holly.colostate.edu</BLOCKQUOTE>
</HTML>

--------------038EC89E25BC250F1B0FC93E--

Adam Carheden wrote:
> One more too.  aCC is still giving the same errors I think, so we're
> supposed to use CC for this assignment still, right?

Yes, aCC still gives the same errors, but in recitation you'll get the
code changes to make Main4.C work. With the changes, your program 
should compile with both CC and aCC. However, I think they'd prefer you 
use the aCC compiler.

If you haven't been to recitation, here are the changes I made to get
Main4.C to compile with aCC:
1. changed void main() to int main()
2. made the following changes in the sort function:
	***In the function declarations***
	LISTdata hold,jdata,indexdata;
	***In the for loop***
	jdata=list.LIST_Get(j);
	indexdata=list.LIST_Get(index);
        if(strcmp(jdata.name,indexdata.name) > 0)

Hope this helps,

Chris

No, my Rect. is tomorrow, but in case I don't go, are they overriding
the "...must work without changing any code in the main program..."?
Am I correct in guessing that it shouldn't really matter since the
implementation of the ADTs would be the same with the original or
modified Main4.C?
-- 
Adam
carheden@holly.colostate.edu
http://holly.ColoState.edu/~carheden