Article View: cu.decstation.managers
Article #958X11R6 performance versus X11R4.
From: Nuno Leitao
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 00:00
10 lines
892 bytes
892 bytes
Hello! I have Compiled/Installed X11R6 in my DEC5000/Ultrix 4.4, I start the X, but it seems to be much slower then it was the old X11R4 that came with Ultrix... Is there a way to make X11R6 go faster ? Thanks... --Nuno Leitao (nleitao@ipp.pt)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<824736497.23624@news.Colorado.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1065d6,d0ba4eae0d6d5f33,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1065d6,public From: npll@nina.idt-isep.ipp.pt (Nuno Leitao) Subject: X11R6 performance versus X11R4. Date: 1996/02/19 Message-ID: <824736497.23624@news.Colorado.EDU> X-Deja-AN: 140060569 distribution: cu sender: daemon@lace.colorado.edu followup-to: poster x-note1: message-id generated by recnews x-note2: mail msgid was <9602191325.AA20155@nina.idt-isep.ipp.pt> organization: University of Colorado at Boulder reply-to: npll@nina.idt-isep.ipp.pt (Nuno Leitao) newsgroups: cu.decstation.managers