🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4l355p$8cg@peabody.colorado.edu> Joe, 
won@oldyeller.Colorado.EDU writes:
>Subject: Re: University E-Mail Policy : CU reads your email
>From: Joe, won@oldyeller.Colorado.EDU
>Date: 17 Apr 1996 16:10:33 GMT
>	This is where I am concerned because if a user can
>misinterpret the Policy...then somewhere down the line,
>someone at UMS (UMS - not CNS - drafted the new policy)
>could use the fact that the Policy leaves room for
>interpretation to their advantage.

Really??? I think the people from all four campuses of
the university who worked on this (Boulder, including CNS,
HSC, UCCS, UCD plus more from Central) would be surprised to
hear it was written by UMS. In addition, the policy went
through years of review - on each campus as well as by
the Policy Board on Information Technology. It was 
published last summer in the _Silver & Gold_. Input was
solicited, but little was received. 

It may never be too late to complain about an issue you 
feel strongly about,  but I encourage you to become 
informed and contribute while policy is being drafted, 
rather than griping after it is adopted. By the way, 
the policy called for each campus to determine how to 
implement the procedures required to authorize access 
to email, but as far as I know, that has not happened on the
Boulder campus.