🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4l3kta$d93@peabody.colorado.edu>,
Linda Drake  <Linda.Drake@Colorado.EDU> wrote:
>In addition, the policy went
>through years of review - on each campus as well as by
>the Policy Board on Information Technology. It was 
>published last summer in the _Silver & Gold_. Input was
>solicited, but little was received. 
>
Silver & Gold?   I can tell you right there why little
input was received - especially by the students.

>It may never be too late to complain about an issue you 
>feel strongly about,  but I encourage you to become 
>informed and contribute while policy is being drafted, 
>rather than griping after it is adopted. By the way, 
>the policy called for each campus to determine how to 
>implement the procedures required to authorize access 
>to email, but as far as I know, that has not happened on the
>Boulder campus.
>
	I hope my original article was not interpreted as griping.
I think I mentioned that it was too late and too hard to change the
Policy at this point. What I did do was question the "final" wording of
the Policy and make suggestions as to alternatives for users to the
University's system as well as methods in which to protect and
safeguard important information that they would otherwise not want
disclosed.
	I'm hoping the "loose" wording of the Policy
and especially in the addendums to the Policy do not
persuade representatives for the Boulder Campus, in their
determination of how to implement authorization, to allow
for more Policy than we really need.

Joe Won